The same can be said about moving to the latest technology refresh (7.1 TR9 and 7.2 TR1 were just announced by the way).
I prefer to talk about the rewards of keeping up with the advances in technology - keep the tool belt fully stocked so to speak.
So, should you install the latest and greatest? My usual answer is "yes, and...".
Whether you are configuring new hardware, putting on a new set of group PTFs, installing the latest TR or migrating to IBM i 7.2, my sincere advice is based on an old Russian proverb:
Trust, but Verify
What this really means is, YOU should be testing the new hardware, testing the group PTFs, verifying the TR code or the latest version of IBM i. And I don't mean give it a spin for a few days on the development system. I'm talking about proper and adequate testing; a real verification of the features and functions. Find out for yourself, do they behave as advertised?
Now here is the issue... proper and adequate testing must be based on science, and some art.
SCIENCE, as in, using the scientific method:
- Purpose or Question
And ART, as in - you have to be clever about how, when and where you apply the science. If you are not testing the business processes that produce the transactions occurring in the production environment, you are not actually verifying anything, nor are you mitigating any risk. You are just fooling yourself. And if you cannot pin down the variables and repeat the process consistently, the experiment will be inconclusive, and a waste of time. I don't know how many times I have been in awkward conversations that go something like this:
DB2 user: "we just upgraded, my queries don't run fast anymore"
Mike: "I'm sorry to hear this... do you have any information captured about how the queries were running prior to the upgrade"?
DB2 user: "no"
Mike: "can you tell me how the queries were running prior to the upgrade"?
DB2 user: "yes, fast"
Mike: *heavy sigh*
When it comes to DB2 data integrity and data processing, three fundamental things need to be tested and verified:
- Correct results
Correct results is obvious - did my request or process produce the expected answer or result?
Performance gets a lot of attention - did my request or process complete in the time expected?
Scalability is much more difficult to understand - did my request or process complete in the time expected when running with the full data set and under the stress of all the normal production activity?
My recommendation is that you get in a position to test (and verify!) that the new hardware and/or software meets your requirements BEFORE implementing anything in the production environment. And with that said, verify your rollback strategy if something does slip by.
When it comes to testing and verifying DB2 for i, the point person should be your database engineer. If you don't have one, now is a good time to establish the position, install the candidates, and provide training and support. Don't forget to give them clear responsibility and authority to do the job.
If you don't have, or don't want to invest in a full fledged testing environment, or you want the subject matter experts to look over your shoulder, make a visit to IBM Rochester, Minnesota and embark on a performance and scalability engagement.
If you would like to discuss the science and art of verifying DB2 for i, please contact me. We are here to help you be successful, and to mitigate risk.
Read the original at DB2 for i.